Triploid Birch Hybrids

Fluorescence Imaging of Birch Mitosis and Meiosis

  • ▲ Fig. 1: Birch woodland in autumn over Dimmuborgir lava field in North Iceland. Shrub-like downy birch typically displays yellow leaf colour, whereas leaves of the low-lying dwarf birch tend to be reddish. Birch shrubs with orange autumn leaves are most likely hybrids or downy birch with gene introgression from dwarf birch.▲ Fig. 1: Birch woodland in autumn over Dimmuborgir lava field in North Iceland. Shrub-like downy birch typically displays yellow leaf colour, whereas leaves of the low-lying dwarf birch tend to be reddish. Birch shrubs with orange autumn leaves are most likely hybrids or downy birch with gene introgression from dwarf birch.
  • ▲ Fig. 1: Birch woodland in autumn over Dimmuborgir lava field in North Iceland. Shrub-like downy birch typically displays yellow leaf colour, whereas leaves of the low-lying dwarf birch tend to be reddish. Birch shrubs with orange autumn leaves are most likely hybrids or downy birch with gene introgression from dwarf birch.
  • Fig. 2: Mitosis - a) Diploid Betula nana has 28 chromosomes. b) Triploid hybrid has 42 chromosomes and five 45S ribosomal sites. c) Tetraploid B. pubescens has 56 chromosomes. d) The tetraploid species has six 45S ribosomal loci, four of which are actively transcribing ribosomal RNA into the nucleolus. Scale bar = 5 µm.
  • Fig. 3: Meiosis - Chromosome behavior in pollen mother cells of tetraploid species B. pubescens (a-c), diploid species B. nana (d-f) and triploid hybrids (g-l). a) Normal synapsis of homologous chromosomes during the pachytene of meiosis I. b) FISH mapping confirms correct pairing of homologous chromosomes at the ribosomal loci. c) Normal chromosome behavior at diakinesis/metaphase with 28 bivalents. d) Normal formation of 14 bivalents. e) Complete segregation at anaphase I. f) Normal formation of quartet at the end of meiosis comprising four microspore nuclei. g) Abnormal behaviour at anaphase I showing unequal segregation and bridges. f) Abnormal behaviour showing unequal segregation and formation of micronuclei. i) Large non-triporate pollen grain (with 4 pores), small triporate pollen grain (with 3 pores) and micronuclei that are becoming disintegrated. j) Two sizes of young pollen grains, large and small, each containing generative nucleus. k) Large and small pollen grains visualized under epifluorescence microscope showing red autofluorescence of the pollen exine wall. l) Pollen from a triploid plant comprises viable, triporate pollen, in which the cytoplasmic content autofluoresces green under blue excitation wavelength, and empty and abnormal (non-triporate), or malformed and shrunken grains. Scale bar = 5 µm.

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of light and fluorescence microscopy in the study of plant genecology and population-based genetics. Analyzing mitotic chromosomes of birch tree species has made it possible to detect interspecific hybridisation in natural woodlands, the process that drives gene flow across species boundaries. Capturing meiotic chromosomes in division, which occurs one week once a year, has confirmed the role of hybrids in mediating the gene flow.

Birch woodland is an integral component of the tundra biome. Arctic tundra is located in the northern hemisphere, encircling the North Pole and extending south to the coniferous forests of the taiga. In geographical Europe, this includes, from east to west, northern Russia, Fennoscandia (northern Finland and Scandinavia), the Svalbard archipelago and Iceland. Tundra vegetation is mostly herbaceous, consisting of a mixture of mosses and lichens, grasses and forbs, along with dwarf shrubs and trees. Birch (Betula L.) is generally the most dominant woodland plant (fig. 1). In Iceland, woodland area has diminished significantly since the first settlement in the ninth century, due to the use of birch as firewood, sheep grazing and recurrent periods of climate cooling. Understanding the ecology and genetics of woodland birch can therefore help manage the ongoing conservation and regeneration of natural vegetation effectively.

Birch Species Hybridisation in Natural Woodlands in Iceland

Two species of Betula co-exist in Iceland: diploid dwarf birch (B. nana) and tetraploid tree birch or downy birch (B. pubescens), and they hybridize in their natural habitats [1]. Both species are found together in most areas, although downy birch occupies lower elevations and a drier habitat compared with dwarf birch, which is more dominant on highlands and near waterfalls and rivers. Betula nana, a circumpolar species, is a prostrate shrub up to 1 m in height, whereas B. pubescens, a European species, may grow up to 25 m tall. However, in Iceland and Fennoscandia a shrub-like subspecies tortuosa (mountain birch) is prevalent.

This type of B. pubescens birch is believed to be the result of introgressive hybridisation with B. nana, via their hybrids [1-4]. Introgressive hybridisation, or hybrid introgression, is a process by which hybridisation leads to gene flow between species through backcrossing of the hybrid with its parental species. The process allows for the transfer of neutral or adaptive traits from one species to another and can increase genetic polymorphism in one or both species. Hybridizing birch dominates woodlands in Iceland (fig. 1). Based on the botanical, cytogenetic, molecular and palynological studies on Icelandic birch [3-7], Iceland is a birch hybrid zone harbouring genetic variation that may be advantageous in the ecological context.

Only a few partially fertile hybrids are sufficient for introgression to occur, and therefore these hybrids may not have been detected. Identifying birch hybrids by morphology is known to be difficult, due to the fact that hybrid introgression has resulted in a huge phenotypic variation in both species [4]. It is nevertheless quite easy to differentiate the two parental species, presumably because each parental type is highly adaptive in its own habitat, but to identify an interspecific hybrid by morphology it is only 49% possible [5]. On the other hand, there is no variation in chromosome number within ploidy groups [3], thus the most reliable means is to identify birch hybrid by determining chromosome number under a microscope. Hybridisation between diploid (2n=2x=28) B. nana and tetraploid (2n=4x=56) B. pubescens produces triploid (2n=3x=42) hybrids (fig. 2a-c). An efficient method of chromosome isolation from birch shoot-tips collected directly in the field has been developed [8]. Chromosomes on microscopic slides are stained with DAPI (4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole), the fluorochrome that binds specifically to chromosomes (fig. 2) and not to cytoplasmic artefacts. DAPI is excited with ultraviolet light and when bound to double-stranded DNA its absorption maximum is at 358 nm and its emission maximum is at 461 nm (blue). In addition, the technique of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), which has been optimized for mapping of the major 45S ribosomal genes on birch chromosomes [9], can further confirm the identity of hybrid and species (fig. 2b,d).

Fluorescence microscopy has made it possible to conduct a large-scale, population-based genetics of tree species. Hundreds of Betula plant samples were collected from woodlands all around Iceland and the results of chromosome counting showed that triploid hybrids were more common than previously thought [5]. Of the 461 plants examined, 9.5% were found to be triploid hybrids. However, the occurrence was variable among locations, from being undetectable up to 20%. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of morphological features of individual plants revealed bi-directional introgression and geographical structure. Shrub-like birch with intermediate or hybrid-like morphology is more common in the woodlands experiencing cold summers (often associated with glacial sites or the interior highlands), compared to birch in the woodlands in lowland areas.

Fertility of Triploid Birch Hybrids

Interspecific triploid hybrids, if they are not totally sterile, can mediate gene flow between the parental species via backcrossing of the hybrids. To demonstrate that a triploid birch hybrid is able to produce fertile gametes, chromosome behavior at meiosis in male catkins has been investigated and the results are shown here for the first time (fig. 3). In a normal meiosis, homologous chromosomes pair completely during meiosis I (fig. 3a-b), thus forming bivalents at metaphase, 28 in tetraploid B. pubescens (fig. 3c) and 14 in diploid B. nana (fig. 3d). Segregation in the following stages proceeds normally (fig. 3e-f) and pollen produced would be normal and viable. On the other hand, the genome of a triploid birch comprises one haploid set of chromosomes from each parental species, therefore the pairing is either incomplete or no pairing at all, i.e. forming 42 univalents. The segregation at later stages is chaotic, often showing chromosome lagging, anaphase bridges, if multivalents exist, and micronuclei (fig. 3g-i). Individual univalents are randomly included in the two daughter nuclei, resulting in some having too many and others having too few chromosomes. Abnormalities in the segregation at meiotic anaphase are common among plant hybrids [10]. But in a few fortunate cases, the whole haploid sets of univalents may separate from each other forming large (presumably B. pubescens) and small (B. nana) microspores, which later become pollen grains (fig. 3i-l). Based on our palynological study [11], the pattern of pollen size distribution within plants indicates that triploid hybrids produce two sizes of triporate pollen grains, but the small B. nana size is far more prevalent than the larger B. pubescens size. Regardless of size, viable pollen grains show normal triporate morphology (pollen with 3 pores), whereas aberrant grains tend to be non-triporate [11]. A few pollen grains produced by triploid plant can be triporate and are viable (e.g. fig. 3l).

The meiotic results presented here are the final proof that triploid birch hybrid is fertile. The results support our hypothesis [3] that progenies (descendants) of backcrosses of triploid hybrids with parental species could be diploid, triploid or tetraploid, depending on whether a hybrid gamete is the small (n=14) or the large (n=28) types. Triploid descendants are therefore second-generation hybrids, and the cycle can go on producing later-generation hybrids. Our population-based introgression study [5] has revealed that triploid hybrids are evidently more than just the F1 generation. The release of a hidden, non-additive genetic variation may be of adaptive significance in the fluctuating environment, for the segregating hybrids as well as for the two species via backcrossing.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all my students and colleagues, in particular Ægir Thór Thórsson and Lilja Karlsdóttir, for the contribution to our research of birch introgressive hybridization.

References
[1] K. Anamthawat-Jónsson: Hybridisation, introgression and phylogeography of Icelandic birch. In: Current Topics in Phylogenetics and Phylogeography of Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems (K Anamthawat-Jónsson, ed.), InTech – Open Access Publisher, Croatia, pp. 117-144 (2012) ISBN 978-953-51-0217-5
[2] T. T. Elkington: Introgressive hybridisation between Betula nana L. and B. pubescens Ehrh. in north-west Iceland, New Phytologist, 67: 109–118 (1968) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1968.tb05459.x
[3] K. Anamthawat-Jónsson, and T. Tómasson: Cytogenetics of hybrid introgression in Icelandic birch, Hereditas, 112: 65-70 (1990) doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1990.tb00138.x
[4] K. Anamthawat-Jónsson, and Æ. Th. Thórsson: Natural hybridisation in birch: triploid hybrids between Betula nana and B. pubescens, Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 75(2): 99-107 (2003) doi: 10.1023/A:1025063123552
[5] Æ. Th. Thórsson, S. Pálsson, A. Sigurgeirsson, and K. Anamthawat-Jónsson: Morphological variation among Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their triploid hybrids in Iceland, Annals of Botany, 99 (6): 1183-1193 (2007) doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm060
[6] Æ. Th. Thórsson, S. Pálsson, M. Lascoux, and K. Anamthawat-Jónsson: Introgression and phylogeography of Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their triploid hybrids in Iceland inferred from cpDNA haplotype variation, Journal of Biogeography, 37(11): 2098-2110 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02353.x
[7] Lilja Karlsdóttir, Margrét Hallsdóttir, Ólafur Eggertsson, Ægir Th. Thórsson, and Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson: Birch hybridization in Thistilfjördur, North-east Iceland during the Holocene, Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 27: 95-109 (2014)
[8] K. Anamthawat-Jónsson: Preparation of chromosomes from plant leaf meristems for karyotype analysis and in situ hybridization, Methods in Cell Science, 25(3-4): 91-95 (2004) doi: 10.1007/s11022-004-5620-y
[9] K. Anamthawat-Jónsson, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison, Molecular cytogenetics of Icelandic birch species: physical mapping by in situ hybridization and rDNA polymorphism. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25: 101-108 (1995) doi: 10.1139/x95-012
[10] J. Ramsey, and D. W. Schemske: Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29: 467-501 (1998) doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467
[11] Lilja Karlsdóttir, Margret Hallsdóttir, Aegir Th. Thórsson, and Kesara Anamthawat‐Jónsson: Characteristics of pollen from natural triploid Betula hybrids, Grana 47(1): 52-59 (2008) doi: 10.1080/00173130801927498

Contact
Prof. Dr. Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson
Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences
University of Iceland
Reykjavik, Iceland
kesara@hi.is

More information on plant cell biology

Read more about fluorescence microscopy
 

Register now!

The latest information directly via newsletter.

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.