Digital Holographic Cytometry

Macrophage Uptake of Nanoprobes

  • Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the HoloMonitor M4 and image reconstruction (PHIAB, Lund, Sweden).Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the HoloMonitor M4 and image reconstruction (PHIAB, Lund, Sweden).
  • Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the HoloMonitor M4 and image reconstruction (PHIAB, Lund, Sweden).
  • Fig. 2: RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 6 x 104 cells per well and monitored for 48 h. A-C) SA-MIPs increased the average cell area, average cell thickness, and average cell volume, respectively. D) The number of cells was not affected by the SA-MIP treatment. All parameters were calculated using digital holographic cytometry. Error bars are based on the standard deviation.
  • Fig. 3: Raw 264.7 macrophage cell were untreated (A) or treated with SA-MIPs (0.04 mg/ml) (B). Images of the cells were captured by digital holographic cytometer during 48 h. Framed area in the images show a disappearance of SA-MIPs after 48 h, due to an uptake by the cells (see video online). All colors are pseudocolors related to the thickness of the cells as shown by the color bar.
Digital holographic cytometry (DHC) is a state-of-the-art quantitative phase imaging (QPI) method that permits time-lapse imaging of cells without induced cellular toxicity. DHC platforms equipped with semi-automated image segmentation and analysis software packages for assessing cell behavior are commercially available. In this study we investigate the possible uptake of nanoprobes in macrophages in vitro over time.
Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) is a promising label-free technique for live-cell imaging [1-6]. The general technique for QPI is the use of interference to convert the phase information into pixel intensity, and thereby directly record the quantitative phase delay [7]. Digital holographic cytometry (DHC) builds on red coherent laser light from a diode laser, which is split into two beams, a sample beam and a reference beam (fig. 1). The sample beam passes through living cells, and merge with the reference beam, thus creating an interference pattern as it hits a digital sensor (e.g. CDD-sensor) [8]. The sensor captures the hologram and converts the signal into a holographic image based on the light phase shifting properties of the cells. Several DHCs can be housed in a mammalian cell incubator and image cells in a large assortment of common culture plates or media, which enables non-invasive and non-interruptive cell analysis. Cellular behavior as well as morphology can be quantified and evaluated using analysis software packages.
Nanoprobes can be quite diverse in design and have substantial clinical potential, such as drug-delivery or detection by artificial antibodies. One of the main issues plaguing nanoprobes circulation in humans, is that it can lead to induction of host inflammatory responses due to non-specific recognition and uptake by macrophages in vivo [9]. Macrophages are leukocytic cells capable of phagocytosing cellular debris, bacteria, and particles through energy-consuming membrane-engulfing. Their essential role is in early response to foreign material/substances and its clearance due to release of cytokines or endotoxins, which activate the macrophages. Phagocytosis occur within minutes of recognition, increasing their rates of phagocytosis [10, 11].
In this study we used molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) targeted to sialic acid (SA).

SA is a monosaccharide that plays an important role in the regulation of the innate immunity [12]. The amount of SA has been found to correlate with cancer, with an upregulation on more aggressive cancers [13-15]. A SA-imprinted polymer shell was grafted from a silica core particle using deprotonated SA as template for MIP growth [16]. Here we demonstrate how DHC can be used to analyze the possible uptake of SA-MIPs in macrophage cells in in vitro cultures.

Material and Methods
Cell Culturing and MIPs
RAW 264.7 cells (ATCC TIB-71, ATCC LGC Standards, Teddington, UK) were cultured in RMPI-1640 medium (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, USA) with addition of 10% fetal calf serum (FBS, Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen) and incubated in 37 ˚C with 5% CO2.
The SA-MIPs were prepared according to a previously described protocol, with deprotonated SA being used as template [16]. Deprotonation was achieved by addition of an equimolar amount of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide to the SA stock solution prior to use in the polymerization. The dried SA-MIPs were resuspended in phosphate saline buffer (PBS, Invitrogen), to a stock solution of 1.0 mg/ml. The SA-MIP had an average size of 200 nm in diameter.
Digital Holographic Cytometry
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in a 6-well polystyrene plate (Sarstedt, Germany) containing 60,000 cells per well and incubated overnight for cells to adhere at 37 ˚C and 5% CO2 (day 0). The RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 0.04 mg/ml SA-MIPs in media (day 1). The lid was changed to Hololids (PHIAB, Lund, Sweden), which enable cell imaging by HoloMonitor M4 DHC (PHIAB, Lund, Sweden). Time-lapse phase imaging as well as image processing, segmentation and analysis were conducted with Hstudio software package (PHIAB) with preset mean values of refractive indexes for cells and culture medium. To monitor SA-MIP uptake, cells were imaged every 15 min after addition for a total of 48 h, at eight positions in each well. Images were segmented followed by object identification for every time point, for further investigation of the uptake of SA-MIPs by RAW 264.7 cells. Segmentation and object identification are the basis for morphological values and cell count.
As the laser intensity is approximately 2W/m2 during imaging, and exposure time is maximum 10 ms it is assumed that the laser irradiation has only minimal effects on the physiological functions of the cells [17-20].
Result and Discussion
Macrophage Uptake of SA-MIPs
RAW 264.7 cells were analyzed with and without SA-MIP treatment in vitro by holographic monitoring of the macrophages over time. Tracking several cell populations over time, which are analyzed at a given time point and average representations of cell morphological parameters area, thickness, and volume are presented (fig. 2A-C). These parameters help monitoring the cellular processes and their response to treatments. In response to SA-MIP treatment, macrophage cell size increased (fig. 2A-C). The role of macrophages is to phagocytose foreign substances, therefore we assume that the increase in cell size is a response to SA-MIP treatment [9-11]. The increase in cell area and cell volume is substantial during the first 24h, which could be caused by an increased phagocytosis after recognition of SA-MIPs (fig. 2A and 2C), as seen in the human body with foreign substances [9-11].
Interestingly, the phagocytosis of the nanoprobes does not affect the macrophages’ ability to keep proliferating (fig. 2). The number of cells increased equally over time for untreated and treated cells, meaning that neither the SA-MIP treatment nor DHC seemed to affect the overall physiological functions of the macrophages (fig. 2D) [17-20].
In the holographic images, the SA-MIPs are represented by red dots and clusters that are present only in images showing treated cells (fig. 3B) and not in the untreated cells (fig. 3A). The quantity of SA-MIPs decreased over time, which is due to an uptake and ingestion by the macrophages (see video online). Moreover, as the nanoprobes will not dissolve due to their chemical construction, it would be assumed that they have been ingested by macrophages. Several clusters of SA-MIPs are seen in the framed area of Fig. 3B after 24h incubation. After 48h they have disappeared from the images (fig 3B). The time-lapse movie clearly shows that the macrophages ingested the nanoprobes as would be expected (see video online).
There are several advantages with DHC and other QPI platforms. Since they can be housed in mammalian cell incubators, they can monitor the behavior of unlabeled cells in real time and calculate the number of cells easily. In this work, we demonstrated that neither the DHC or the SA-MIPs did affect the physiological functions of macrophages as they phagocytosed the nanoprobes over time and still proliferated in a similar manner as the control macrophages. The utility of this method is that it is quick, quantitative, and qualitative, which is essential for future cell-based research.

The authors would like to thank the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 721297 for financial support and Malmö University.

Additional Material
Time-lapse movie: macrophages ingesting nanoprobes: see video

More information on Quantitative Phase Imaging

Louise Sternbæk1,2, Martha Wamaitha Kimani3, Kornelia Gawlitza3, Birgit Janicke1, Kersti Alm1, and Anette Gjörloff Wingren2

1Phase Holographic Imaging AB, Lund, Sweden
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
3Chemical and Optical Sensing Division, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin, Germany

Louise Sternbæk

Phase Holographic Imaging AB
Lund, Sweden
Department of Biomedical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Society
Malmö University
Malmö, Sweden

[1] Kastl L, Isbach M, Dirksen D, Schnekenburger J, and Kemper B: Quantitative phase imaging for cell culture quality control, Cytom Part A, 91(5):470-481 (2017) doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23082
[2] Majeed H, Sridharan S, Mir M, Ma L, Min E, Jung W, and Popescu G: Quantitative phase imaging for medical diagnosis, J Biophotonics, 10(2):177-205 (2017). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201600113
[3] Luther E, Mendes LP, Pan J, Costa DF, and Torchilin VP: Applications of label-free, quantitative phase holographic imaging cytometry to the development of multi-specific nanoscale pharmaceutical formulations, Cytom Part A, 91(5):412-423 (2017) doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23102

[4] El-Schich Z, Leida Mölder A, and Gjörloff Wingren A. Quantitative Phase Imaging for Label-Free Analysis of Cancer Cells—Focus on Digital Holographic Microscopy, Appl Sci, 8(7): 1027 (2018) doi: 10.3390/app8071027
[5] Alm K, El-Schich Z, Miniotis MF, Wingren AG, Janicke B, and Oredsson S: Cells and Holograms-Holograms and Digital Holographic Microscopy as a Tool to Study the Morphology of Living Cells. Holography-Basic principles and contemporary applications, Intech, 335-351 (2013) doi: 10.5772/54505
[6] Marquet P, Rappaz B, Magistretti PJ, Cuche E, Emery Y, Colomb T, and Depeursinge C: Digital holographic microscopy : a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy, Opt Lett, 30(5):468-70 (2005) doi: 10.1364/OL.30.000468
[7] Masters BR: Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues, J Biomed Opt, (2011)
[8] Xiao X and Puri IK: Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of holograms: A new optical diagnostic for combustion, Appl Opt, 41(19):3890-9 (2002) doi: 10.1364/AO.41.003890
[9] Gustafson HH, Holt-Casper D, Grainger DW, and Ghandehari H: Nanoparticle uptake: The phagocyte problem, Nano Today, 10(4):487-510 (2015) doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006
[10] Murray PJ and Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets, Nat Rev Immunol, 11(11):723-37 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nri3073
[11] Shi C and Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation, Nat Rev Immunol, 11(11): 762–774 (2011) doi: 10.1038/nri3070
[12] Fujita T, Satomura A, Hidaka M, Ohsawa I, Endo M, and Ohi H. Inhibitory effect of free sialic acid on complement activation and its significance in hypocomplementemic glomerulonephritis, J Clin Lab Anal, 13(4):173-9 (1999) doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1999)13:43.0.CO;2-U
[13] Cui H, Lin Y, Yue L, Zhao X, and Liu J. Differential expression of the α2,3-sialic acid residues in breast cancer is associated with metastatic potential, Oncol Rep, 25(5):1365-71 (2011) doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1192
[14] Ferreira JA, Videira PA, Lima L, Pereira S, Silva M, Carrascal M, Severino PF, Fernandes E, Almeida A, Costa C, Vitorino R, Amaro T, Oloveira MJ, Reis CA, Dall'Olio F, Amado F, and Santos LL. Overexpression of tumour-associated carbohydrate antigen sialyl-Tn in advanced bladder tumours, Mol Oncol, 7(3):719-731 (2013) doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.03.001
[15] Seidenfaden R, Krauter A, Schertzinger F, Gerardy-Schahn R, and Hildebrandt H. Polysialic Acid Directs Tumor Cell Growth by Controlling Heterophilic Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Interactions, Mol Cell Biol, 23(16):5908-18 (2003) doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.16.5908-5918.2003
[16] Shinde S, El-Schich Z, Malakpour A, Wan W, Dizeyi N, Mohammadi R, Rurack K, Gjörloff AW, and Sellergren B. Sialic Acid-Imprinted Fluorescent Core-Shell Particles for Selective Labeling of Cell Surface Glycans, J Am Chem Soc, 137(43):13908-12 (2015) doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08482
[17] Hawkins DH and  Abrahamse H. The role of laser fluence in cell viability, proliferation, and membrane integrity of wounded human skin fibroblasts following Helium-Neon laser irradiation, Lasers Surg Med, 38(1):74-83 (2006) doi: 10.1002/lsm.20271
[18] Logg K, Bodvard K, Blomberg A, Käll M, and All M. Investigations on light-induced stress in fluorescence microscopy using nuclear localization of the transcription factor Msn2p as a reporter, FEMS Yeast Res, 9(6):875–84 (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00536.x
[19] Mölder A, Sebesta M, Gustafsson M, Gisselson L, Wingren AG, and Alm K. Non-invasive, label-free cell counting and quantitative analysis of adherent cells using digital holography, J Microsc. 232(2):240-7 (2008) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02095.x
[20] Tinevez JY, Dragavon J, Baba-Aissa L, Roux P, Perret E, Canivet A, Galy V, and Shorte S. A quantitative method for measuring phototoxicity of a live cell imaging microscope, Methods Enzymol, 506:291-309 (2012) doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391856-7.00039-1


Register now!

The latest information directly via newsletter.

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.